Vital Agri Nutrients (Pvt) Ltd · Lahore, PakistanVerify a bagFind a dealer+92 42 35762215
VAN — Vital Agri NutrientsProductsCrop PlansMake With UsVAN LabKnowledgeAboutOrder from the plant
Our Brands / Nitrogen / Vital Urea
NITROGEN · HERO PRODUCT

Vital UreaSulfur Coated Urea — N 32% min · S 13% min

Nitrogen that feeds the crop, not the air. In Pakistan's alkaline, hot soils a large share of plain urea's nitrogen is lost before the plant can use it. Vital Urea's sulfur coating releases N in step with crop demand — and the sulfur itself conditions the root zone, temporarily acidifying it to unlock fixed phosphorus and zinc.

BroadcastSowing / basal + top-dressVAN exclusive🎖 Patented · No. 144684

The sulfur-coating technology behind Vital Urea is protected by Pakistan Patent No. 144684, granted by the Government of Pakistan Patent Office.

Vital Urea
32% N · 13% Sguaranteed analysis — at least 8.0 kg of nitrogen and 3.25 kg of sulfur in every 25 kg bag
7–18 daysrelease profile, depending on climate and application method
No. 144684Pakistan Patent — the sulfur-coating technology, Government of Pakistan Patent Office
PS 217-2023PSQCA standard · licence CM/L-4126/2025 · released through VAN's PNAC-accredited laboratory

The technology, and why it is sulfur

Nitrogen loss in Pakistani soil is chemistry, not carelessness, and the case for moving off plain urea is set out with its sources on why Pakistan must shift. This page is about the coating: what it does, what it cannot do, and why it is made of sulfur.

Plain urea NH₃ ↑  ammonia, straight to the air NO₃⁻ ↓  nitrate, past the root zone N₂O / N₂ ↑  denitrified in wet ground Vital Urea metered out across 7–18 days what the crop is asking for 036912151821 days after application nitrogen in the soil solution

Charts and diagrams on this page scroll sideways on a small screen.

Schematic, not a measurement. Both curves carry the same nitrogen — the only difference is when it arrives. The demand curve is drawn for shape, not for scale, and no axis here carries a figure VAN has not published.

1 · What the coating actually does — and what it cannot do

The sulfur shell is not a wrapper. It is a barrier with a deliberate failure rate. Water finds its way in through pores and micro-cracks in the sulfur, dissolves the urea inside, and the solution diffuses back out through the same paths. Nothing releases until water gets in.

That is what produces the 7–18 day release profile on this page. Three things move it inside that range: soil temperature, because diffusion and the microbes both run faster when it is hot; moisture, because a dry seedbed releases nothing; and how the bag is handled, because a granule crushed at spreading has no barrier left and behaves like plain urea from the moment it hits the ground.

The mechanism is entirely this: nitrogen still inside a granule is not in the soil solution. Volatilisation, nitrification and leaching all act on nitrogen that is dissolved. What has not been released yet cannot be lost yet. That is the whole of the picture above — not less nitrogen, the same nitrogen, arriving while there is a root ready to take it.

What it does not do. A coating does not stop volatilisation — it reduces how much nitrogen is exposed to it at any one moment. Nitrogen released into hot alkaline soil behaves like any other nitrogen released into hot alkaline soil. Placement and irrigation timing still matter, and no coating substitutes for either.
2 · Why sulfur, not a polymer or an inhibitor — the choice, made for this country
Polymer coatingControls release accurately and delivers nothing else. Inert, adds no nutrient, stays in the soil after the nitrogen has gone.
Chemical inhibitorsSlow the reactions rather than the release. Imported, dose-sensitive, temperature-sensitive, and they add no nutrient of their own.
Sulfur coatingControls release and is the only one of the three that is itself a nutrient and itself chemically active in the soil.

A 25 kg bag carries at least 8.0 kg of nitrogen and 3.25 kg of sulfur — 32% N and 13% S are registered minimums, so that is the floor and not the content. Read as a sum, that is a nitrogen fertilizer with some sulfur in it. The next two sections are why it is not.

And 3.25 kg is the nutrient, not the material. The sulfur VAN charges to the coater is 80% pure, so putting 3.25 kg of elemental sulfur into the bag means putting in about 4.06 kg of sulfur material — 3.25 ÷ 0.80, and a sixth of a 25 kg bag by weight. A coating that is a sixth of the pack is not packaging.

Which of those numbers is which. 3.25 kg is registered — 13% of 25 kg under PS 217-2023, and it is what the crop takes up as sulfate. 80% is the purity of the sulfur VAN buys. 4.06 kg is the arithmetic between them and not a batch assay: what VAN publishes on a certificate is the elemental sulfur, most recently 13.27% on batch VU25186.
3 · Why the result is not nitrogen plus sulfur — two pictures

Sulfur is not plant food until the soil oxidises it to sulfate — and that reaction happens only on the surface.

one lump almost no surface fine, dispersed all surface, goes everywhere fine, on the granule all surface, stays with the N 90% S pastille 0.0006 / day fine S in soil 0.02 / day — about 33× faster measured oxidation rate of elemental sulfur, per day (Degryse et al., 2016)

Same element, same mass, three geometries. Rapid oxidation calls for particles finer than about 20 µm, well dispersed (Bremer, 2022) — which is exactly what a shell micronised onto a granule is. The reaction is biological, so it roughly triples to quadruples for every 10 °C of soil warming (Janzen and Bettany, 1987): the heat that destroys surface urea is the heat that runs this.

2 S⁰ + 3 O₂ + 2 H₂O → 2 SO₄²⁻ + 4 H⁺ Elemental sulfur to sulfate — four protons per two atoms of sulfur

And nitrogen that arrives without sulfur does not become yield.

N no sulfur — gate shut nitrogen the plant already absorbed parks as nitrate and soluble amines N S sulfur present — gate open amino acids → protein → grain the nitrogen becomes yield

Both are built into protein. Where sulfur is short, nitrogen the plant has already absorbed accumulates as nitrate and soluble amines, and nitrogen use efficiency falls with it (Grzebisz et al., 2022; Elbasyoni et al., 2026). Wheat builds protein at about fifteen parts nitrogen to one part sulfur, and above seventeen to one yield falls away — so each kilogram of sulfur the crop is short of is roughly 10–15 kg of nitrogen that cannot be finished into protein (Zapałowska et al., 2026; Wan et al., 2012). It is a cereal ratio: oilseed rape and the brassicas run far lower. The protons from that reaction also land exactly where the nitrogen is — dissolving phosphorus held as calcium phosphate and freeing zinc, iron and manganese held by alkalinity (Khoshru et al., 2023). That is the nutrient the ground already contains.

Where this stops being certain. Alkaline soil is a harder place to oxidise sulfur, not an easier one. In a controlled comparison elemental sulfur oxidised faster in acid soil, and lowered the pH of an alkaline soil only where a sulfur-oxidising inoculant was added with it (Mattiello et al., 2017). It is a microsite effect either way — a zone around each granule, for the weeks it is releasing. It will not move a soil test, and VAN does not claim it does. Raising that oxidation rate deliberately is a live VAN research track, not a product claim.
4 · Coated on every granule, not blended into the bag — the argument that decides the other three

Everything above needs the nitrogen and the sulfur in the same place at the same moment. A mixture cannot promise that.

blended in the bag coated on the granule handling · hopper · spreader disc the same journey one end of the field gets the nitrogen, the other gets the sulfur every granule carries both, to the same spot

Two materials in one bag separate by size and by density, and the wider the size spread across the components, the more severe it gets (Antille et al., 2013). A coated granule cannot separate from itself. The shell is also what creates the surface in the first figure: the same sulfur as a lump would still be sitting there next season.

What is claimed here and what is not. Uniformity is a batch record, not a slogan. What VAN publishes is the declared analysis — 32% N and 13% S, registered against PS 217-2023 and released through VAN’s PNAC-accredited laboratory. Coating weight is measured per batch. VAN does not publish the figure, and will provide it against a batch number on the same terms as the certificate. No granule-to-granule figure is claimed on this page because none is published — not because none is measured.
Sources for this section. Peer-reviewed findings about elemental sulfur, coated urea and blended fertilizers as technologies, under the conditions each study describes. None of them is a measurement of Vital Urea.
  1. Degryse, F., Ajiboye, B., Baird, R., et al. (2016). Oxidation of elemental sulfur in granular fertilizers depends on the soil-exposed surface area. Soil Science Society of America Journal 80(2), 294–305. doi:10.2136/sssaj2015.06.0237
  2. Bremer, E. (2022). Efficacy of elemental sulfur fertilizers. Crops & Soils 56(1), 34–37. doi:10.1002/crso.20241
  3. Janzen, H. H., & Bettany, J. R. (1987). Oxidation of elemental sulfur under field conditions in central Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 67(3), 609–618. doi:10.4141/cjss87-057 — temperature response as summarised by Degryse et al. (2016).
  4. Grzebisz, W., Zielewicz, W., & Przygocka-Cyna, K. (2022). Deficiencies of secondary nutrients in crop plants — a real challenge to improve nitrogen management. Agronomy 13(1), 66. doi:10.3390/agronomy13010066
  5. Elbasyoni, I. S., Al-Otayk, S. M., Ghonimy, M., et al. (2026). Advancing wheat productivity through nutrient interactions, fertilizer practices, and genetic improvement. Life 16(5), 795. doi:10.3390/life16050795
  6. Khoshru, B., Fallah Nosratabad, A., Mitra, D., et al. (2023). Rock phosphate solubilizing potential of soil microorganisms. Bacteria 2(2), 98–115. doi:10.3390/bacteria2020008
  7. Mattiello, E. M., da Silva, R. C., Degryse, F., et al. (2017). Sulfur and zinc availability from co-granulated Zn-enriched elemental sulfur fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65(6), 1108–1115. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04586
  8. Zapałowska, A., et al. (2026). Selenium (IV) and sulphur (VI) as elements modifying plant quality: content of selenium and sulphur forms in wheat. Molecules 31(1), 160. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160 — the N:S optima, summarising Sedlár et al.
  9. Wan, Y., Shewry, P. R., & Hawkesford, M. J. (2012). Developmental and environmental effects on the assembly of glutenin polymers and the impact on grain quality of wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 56(1), 72–80. doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2011.10.014 — critical grain S 1.2 mg/g and N:S 17:1.
  10. Antille, D. L., Sakrabani, R., & Tyrrel, S. (2013). Characterisation of organomineral fertilisers derived from nutrient-enriched biosolids granules. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 2013, 694597. doi:10.1155/2013/694597 — reporting the segregation thresholds of Miserque and Pirard.

Application & dosage

From the locked VAN crop nutrition plans (2025 set). This table is a sample. Vital Urea appears in 27 of the 28 published programmes — see the full plan library.

CropStageDose per acreMethod
GarlicLand Preparation1 bag (25 kg)Broadcasting
GarlicGermination1 bag (25 kg)Broadcast
SesameGermination1 bag (25 kg)Side dressing / Broadcasting
SesameEarly Growth½ bag (12.5 kg)Side dressing / Broadcasting
SoybeanLand Preparation½ bag (12.5 kg)Broadcasting
LentilLand Preparation½ bag (12.5 kg)Broadcasting
Mungbean & MashLand Preparation½ bag (12.5 kg)Broadcasting
CanolaLand Preparation1 bag (25 kg)Side dressing / Broadcasting

Growing a different crop? The full stage-by-stage programme for 28 crops is in our crop nutrition plans → · how application changes the answer →

The evidence, and its limits

We publish what has been tested and we say plainly how it was tested. Nothing below is an estimate.

What the published research establishes about coated urea

These are peer-reviewed findings about sulfur-coated and controlled-release urea as a technology, under the conditions each study describes. They are not measurements of Vital Urea.

What we have tested ourselves

Field programme with Rafhan Maize — Khaliqabad, 2023

Run in collaboration with Rafhan Maize Products, whose agronomy team identified the five grower sites, from application in August 2023 through to harvest in October, with assessments at 12 and 24 days. The comparison was deliberately uneven: one 25 kg bag of Vital Urea, carrying at least 8.0 kg of nitrogen and 3.25 kg of sulfur, against one 50 kg bag of conventional urea carrying 23 kg of nitrogen.

Across the growth parameters assessed — shoot length, colour, leaf number and vigour — the single 25 kg bag produced comparable crop growth to the 50 kg bag of conventional urea, on roughly a third of the applied nitrogen and with the sulfur included. Observers additionally recorded better uniformity of plant height, improved grain formation, more milk-line development and better disease tolerance. Cob size and length showed no difference between the two.

That is the whole argument for a coating, stated without a percentage: on alkaline ground, nitrogen that is released gradually and stays in the root zone does more work than a larger quantity that volatilises.

What this programme was, and was not It was an observational field programme across five grower sites, not a replicated randomised trial. Assessments were agronomic observations at defined intervals rather than a statistical analysis, and no independent yield measurement was recorded. We report it as exactly that. If you need replicated trial data for a purchasing decision, ask us — where it exists, you will get it.
Published trial — maize, VAN’s trial station, 2024

A randomised complete block design with three replications on DK-6321 maize compared nitrogen strategies including sulfur-coated urea and conventional urea. Two stage-timed applications of sulfur-coated urea — at the 4–6 leaf stage and again twenty days later at the 8–12 leaf stage — outperformed a five-application programme of conventional urea followed by calcium ammonium nitrate across the growth and yield parameters measured.

Umair, A., Manzoor, M., Saleem, M. S., Akram, S., Ali, M., Batool, A., Javaid, T., Javaid, A., Sharif, M. N. & Haider, M. S. (2025). Planta Animalia 4(3), 129–135. DOI 10.71454/PA.004.03.0126.

We cite this study for its finding — that fewer, stage-timed applications of coated nitrogen outperformed more frequent applications of uncoated nitrogen — and not for a headline yield figure, because the paper reports its own yield inconsistently between its results table and its discussion. We would rather tell you that here than have you find it.

Why this matters beyond one product. Roughly a quarter of the nitrogen applied to Pakistan's cropland is taken up by the crop — against about 72% in the United States (Lassaletta et al., 2014, Environmental Research Letters 9:105011). Vital Urea exists because of that number. See the national picture →

Standards, packs & documents

Registration & standard

PSQCA PS 217-2023 · License CM/L-4126/2025

Pack sizes

25 kg bag

Quality

Released through VAN’s own PNAC-accredited laboratory — ISO/IEC 17025:2017, Accreditation No. LAB 336.

A VAN flagship — exclusively ours

Vital Urea stays a VAN brand. Carry it through our distribution network — territory and volume terms available.

Become a distributor →
WhatsApp